skip to main |
skip to sidebar
'If we treated the great
church as a public promenade, or rather as a splendid international
salon,
the fault was not wholly our own, and indeed practically there was little
profanity in such an attitude. One’s attitude was insignificant, and the
bright immensity of the place protected conversation and even gossip. It struck
one not as a particular temple, but as formed by the very walls of the faith
that has no small pruderies to enforce.'
'The problem with strategic irony is that it avoids responsibility; it is
‘defensive’, ‘pusillanimous’, ‘craven’—a mere ‘manipulation of tone’,
little more than ‘attitudinizing’. It puts the emphasis on the writer’s
relationship with the reader, rather than on the matter of the poem, and
so it is both tiresomely ingratiating and contemptibly apologetic.'
- Intelligence with regard to form, which is, or at least should be a
basic prerequisite of all poetry, may be the only thing which can, when
raised high enough, replace affectation with artfulness,
and remove the obligation to irony—for those who wish to avoid it. I
mean to suggest that both affectation and artfulness, which are usually
taken for bad qualities, are in another sense fundamental elements of
poetry (and lyric, perhaps, especially).
- 'Philosophy of mind is more than marketing trick. But it’s hard to
prevent hot and trendy topics from blending together, even when they
themselves are much weightier: ISIS, political correctness, a dog
playing a cowbell, an actress giving a speech at the Oscars, a dress.
They are all just content. Any content will do.'
'Aside from the serious risks to an informed citizenry and a
functioning democracy associated with treating mere conjecture and
opinion as objective reporting, there is the danger of contagion. Unless
people are fortunate enough to have studied argumentation or are
otherwise capable of separating at least reasonable objectivity from
fiction, they’re likely to be easily led. A functional democracy is underpinned by — indeed impossible without — informed citizens. Aristotle
argued for teaching the techniques of persuasion so that people might
protect themselves from distraction and dishonesty. Without such
awareness, each of us risks becoming the easy victim of modern day
sophistry.'