....'metaphor started growing ragged and incoherent very quickly; it went
from positive analogy to negative analogy. If the model was a planetary
one, then how come the electrons were not continually losing energy in
their orbits, as one would expect? If the inside of an atom were really
functioning according to its metaphoric other half then the electron
would soon lose its necessary energy and spin counter-clockwise into the
nucleus. And in any case, since the force of the nucleus is positive
and that of the electron negative, why don’t the two simply get together
as soon as possible? Either way, there would be no atom. The metaphor
only works if (however remotely) this can still be said to be that.'
Abonați-vă la:
Postare comentarii (Atom)
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu